Both Flesh And Not - David Foster Wallace



David Foster Wallace, the pioneering postmodern novelist and award-winning writer, died in 2008. Wallace, though, was just as famed for his unique non-fiction, with previous collections A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again and Consider The Lobster released to critical acclaim. Needless to say, Wallace’s third - and, sadly, final - non-fiction anthology has a lot of hopes riding on it.
            The collection opens with the titular Federer Both Flesh And Not; an observational piece, focussing on Roger Federer’s 2006 Wimbledon final against Rafael Nadal, that also seeks to illustrate the wider phenomenon of televised sports. Chock full of amazing little descriptions (Federer’s forehand - “a great liquid whip”) and blink-inducing observations (“TV tennis is to live tennis pretty much as video porn is to the felt reality of human love”), it’s easy to see why the essay is sometimes regarded as Wallace’s non-fiction masterpiece. The end of the article comes as a shock; not because of some macabre twist, but because it ends at all. As a rule, the longer a Wallace essay is, the more engrossing and immersive it is. Federer Both Flesh And Not is no exception; his near-perfect blend of encyclopaedic knowledge with a conversational, personal tone is back here in full force.
            The tennis theme resurfaces later on with Democracy and Commerce at the U.S. Open, a more informal piece detailing Wallace’s disillusioned experiences at a corporate logo-laden sporting event. His unique yet relatable observations take centre stage, as he points out Security (for whom “chewing gum seems to be part of the issued equipment”) and the players themselves, who ignore the cameras “in the way that only people who are very used to cameras can ignore cameras”. This focus on the little details seems to be the essence of Wallace’s ability to take any subject and make it captivating. 
            Wallace also brings back his famed footnotes here, with annotations dotted throughout the text - serving to expand on lateral points while avoiding any fragmentation of the main narrative. There’s a sense that they may be indicative of the fractured and disjointed state of 21st Century Man, but they’re also ludicrously funny; here he allows himself to meditate on some of the more eccentric characters he bumps into, complains about the “wildly aggressive” queues at concession stands, and generally gives a more frantic – and human – depiction of his experiences.  In one particularly sharp footnote, as Wallace notices crowds pushing through turnstiles, he remarks that with “NYC being one of the most turnstile-intensive cities in the world, New Yorkers push through turnstiles with the same sort of elegantly casual élan that really top players evince when warming up.” This is one of the shorter notes – some come dangerously close to covering entire pages.
            Some other pieces do feel a little out of place– although by no means unreadable. The (As It Were) Seminal Importance of Terminator 2, originally published in 1998, is one of these. While the article oozes with a redundant sense of VCRs and Sony Walkmans (“Cameron’s new film, Titanic, which is currently in production”), it does seem oddly prophetic. When Wallace introduces us to his theory of The Inverse Cost & Quality Law, it’s easy to find yourself nodding your head. “Cameron’s premise is financially canny and artistically dismal,” he writes, explaining that a movie with a big budget must succeed and therefore must adhere by the same winning formulas – i.e. throw innovation and originality out of the window. Looking at some of the highest grossing films of all time – Avatar (a sci-fi retelling of Pocahontas), the 2010 rehash of Alice In Wonderland, as well as the CGI-and-explosion-riddled Transformers: Dark of the Moon – it’s worth considering that Wallace may have been ahead of his time.
            Even more outdated, though, is the 1988 essay Fictional Futures and the Conspicuously Young, where Wallace explores the (then) rising phenomenon of what he called ‘Conspicuously Young’ writers; one example being Bret Easton Ellis, of American Psycho fame, who published his first novel whilst still in college. The piece, while fascinating, seems a little unstructured; Wallace quickly meanders onto such tangential topics as advertising and the merits (or lack thereof) of Creative Writing Programs, finally bringing the piece back to focus via a meditation on television’s effect on the next generation of writers.
            As with the Terminator article, there is a whiff of prophecy here. Whilst no doubt an innovative piece at the time, though, the literary landscape has been maturing for a quarter of a century since its publication, and many of Wallace’s original points rely on the cultural references of a generation past. This is perhaps more of an issue with Wallace’s editors, and their decision to include such an old piece, but at the same time it’s interesting to delve a little deeper into the literary past.
            The literary theme is one of Wallace’s favourites – second only, possibly, to tennis. We see him explore writing and language further in three more essays and articles; The Nature of the Fun, The Best of the Prose Poem, and Twenty-Four Word Notes.
            The Nature of the Fun delves into the world of fiction writing, citing Don DeLillo’s metaphor of a book in-progress as “a kind of hideously damaged infant that follows the writer around, forever crawling after the writer.” “The damaged infant trope,” Wallace says, “is perfect because it captures the mix of repulsion and love the fiction writer feels for something he’s working on.” He builds on the idea of fiction writing being a paradoxical blend of torture and ecstasy, providing an insight both invaluable to writers and fascinating to readers.
            The Best of The Prose Poem is an odd little article; a book review that’s also a wider analysis of an often-overlooked subgenre of literary fiction.  The anthology it concerns itself with is partially praised, with Wallace remarking that 31 of the 204 prose poems within are memorable, 9 of which are fantastic, although 5 of those 9 are by a single person. His approach, almost statistical in nature, is due to Wallace’s unusual (even for him) writing style here. Using what he calls “the Indexical Book Review”, he relays facts in bullet points in a very clinical fashion. For example: “Total # of prose poems in anthology: 204... Total # of contributors who do/did edit literary journals, anthologies, and/or small presses: 21.” Wallace explains that, through some grammatical wizardry, the words before each colon shouldn’t count towards the rigid 1,000 word limit that the editors imposed on him. You get a real sense of the maverick Wallace here, and it’s clear he relishes in the use of more experimental styles. The ‘Indexical Book Review’ format throws up some gems (“% [of prose poems in the anthology] about sex: 16.6... % about love: 0.2”) but also some frown-inducers (“Square root of book’s ISBN: 43,520.065”). As is often the case, you get the sense that Wallace may have over-egged the pudding – but you can’t help forgiving him for being so innovative.
            Twenty-Four Word Notes is exactly what it says on the tin; a list of twenty-four words, and Wallace’s notes on them. What initially seems like a dry affair quickly becomes surprisingly engaging. The article opens with Utilize, which Wallace correctly regards as no different from “good old use... using utilize makes you seem either like a pompous twit or like someone so insecure that she’ll [?] pointlessly use big words in an attempt to look sophisticated.” The same, he says, is correct for ‘vehicle’ as opposed to ‘car’. It’s hard to believe that this article was written almost ten years ago; with hotels nowadays serving ‘beverages’ instead of ‘drinks’ and offering ‘tea and coffee making facilities’ instead of ‘a kettle’. Once again, Wallace seems to have had a keen eye for the immediate future.
            A hidden nugget of hilarity is tucked away in this article when Wallace briefly, in a trademark tangent, touches on the language of advertising. Examples he gives to illustrate the stupidity of ‘Advertising English’ (“Save up to 50%... and More!”) add an extra dose of amusement to an already fulfilling article.
            It might seem that Both Flesh And Not is as good as any of Wallace’s work published within his lifetime. Sadly, this isn’t entirely the case. Some of the smaller pieces seem almost like filler, with Overlooked: Five direly underappreciated U.S. novels > 1960 leading the charge. A two-page micro-multi-review, it starts promisingly (describing William H.Gass’ Omensetter’s Luck as “bleak but gorgeous, like light through ice”) but quickly turns sour. His three word review of Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian – “Don’t even ask” – gives the sense that Wallace tried to be clever and overshot. The other micro-reviews are concise but unsatisfying.
            Just Asking, another two-page article, also fails to get off the ground before it finishes. Composed entirely of questions regarding 9/11, American foreign policy, and the notion of freedom, one can’t help thinking that expanding the word count tenfold – and adding Wallace’s trademark footnotes – would have made a mind-blowingly-good essay.
            By far the worst piece is Back In New Fire, an opinion piece that Wallace wrote in 1996. It outlines his belief that the AIDS epidemic added an element of “medieval daredevilry” to the casual intercourse of the post-sexual revolution decades (prior to the writing of the article). He likens sex during the AIDS crisis to a knight rescuing a fair maiden from a fire-breathing dragon, and while some of his observations are astute (“’Fair maiden’ means ‘good-looking virgin’, by the way”), the entire article borders on offensive. It’s hard to believe that a) such an informed and perceptive mind would write such a piece, b) that it was published, and c) that Wallace’s editors chose to include it in this collection.
            Granted, some of Wallace’s best work is in here. There are pieces that inform, engage and make you struggle to hold in laughter. But there are pieces that bore and drag; pieces that make you shake your head. A mixed bag indeed.
            Is this Wallace’s fault, though? There were probably reasons why he didn’t include some of the earlier pieces in his first two collections – which could add weight to the possibility that Both Flesh And Not is David Foster Wallace’s non-fiction B-Team, cobbled together in a manner that might well have been against his wishes.
            But even if this is Wallace’s B-Sides compilation, any writer who can claim this collection as among the worst of their work should be proud. Both Flesh And Not is a patch of rough brimming with diamonds.

No comments:

Post a Comment